The computerized network that the IRS utilizes to communicate with delinquent taxpayers via the IDRS, or Integrated Data Retrieval System, is known as the ACS, or Automated Collection System.
To handle the collection of taxes and to let IRS employees to communicate with taxpayers to combat the delinquent taxes IRS issue, the ACS was developed in the 1980s. Tax examiners also use the system to review certain cases and provide notices, levies, or liens in order to fix the tax debt. Certain information is saved in the system, which includes taxpayer details on delinquent accounts or returns, and audit information, which includes each step taken in a certain case.
Every item of information that's saved in the ACS is verified by other means, like bank statements, corporate files, court records, and by contacting creditors. Checks for validity and consistency are built into the system.
The question remains if the ACS is an effective way to collect taxes. A hearing to determine if private means were better than the ACS was held by congress.
ACS is much less expensive, as emphasized by consumer tax advocates opposed to privatization. Nina Olsen, the IRS's National Taxpayer Advocate, compared the costs of utilizing private outsourced collections against ACS. Including commissions of up to 24% per amount collected, the expense of the private collection program is $12 million each year. These collectors are expected to bring in a meager $23 million in 2008, resulting in net revenues of only $11 million.
With no commissions and only $7 million in investment, however, revenues of $91.8 million to $145 million are brought in by the ACS. Compared to the privatization of collections that cost the government $81 million a year, this is more cost effective.
On the other hand, the IRS reasons that it has turned to outsourcing because it can't afford to employ more revenue employees to handle the IRS issue of debt colrently examining the efficiency of the private debt collection process by regaining control over specific caseslection. The IRS is cur that were turned over to debt collection firms and handling them in-house. They intend to decide which method is more effective by comparing the outcomes.
The president of the National Treasury Employees Union, or NTEU, Colleen Kelley, emphasized her opinion that private debt collectors are more expensive than hiring revenue officers and puts taxpayers' details at risk.
Kelley also points to the fact that IRS employees are some of the most effective tax collectors in the United States in her opposition to the private collection of federal taxes. For instance, the cost of collection for a debt of $100 by IRS officers was only 40 cents. In spite of a big decrease in the number of IRS employees, this is a two cent drop from 2007. Ms. Kelley says, "The IRS operates one of the most cost-efficient tax collection systems in the world, yet this administration insists on forging ahead with its costly privatization scheme in spite of dismal financial results and ever-growing opposition."
The government can regain revenue from unpaid taxes with the ACS. As opposed to the IRS employees' cost efficient work, private debt collection is costly.
Filed under Blog by Len Stauffenger